ANTIGRAVITY LABJP
Articles/Tips & Best Practices
Tips & Best Practices/2026-03-15Intermediate

Daily Development Workflow with Your AI Partner — How Antigravity Transforms the Plan-Build-Verify Cycle

Learn how to use Antigravity not just as a code completion tool, but as a true thinking partner. This guide systematizes the Plan-Implement-Verify cycle for collaborating with AI at every stage of daily development.

workflow49AI10tips36productivity20premium16

Setup and context — From "Using" AI to "Collaborating" With It

When developers first pick up Antigravity, most treat it like an advanced autocomplete tool. But after a few weeks, the real value becomes clear: Antigravity works best as a partner that helps you think through problems before you write a single line of code.

This article walks through a concrete workflow for weaving Antigravity into every phase of your development process — planning, implementation, and verification. It's aimed at developers who have been using Antigravity for one to three months and want to get noticeably more out of it.


Phase 1: Plan — The 15 Minutes Before You Write Code

Start by Explaining Your Task to Antigravity

Before opening a file, describe today's task in the Agent panel. This serves two purposes: it forces you to clarify your own thinking, and it gives Antigravity the context it needs to make useful suggestions throughout the session.

// Example input to the Agent panel
Today's task: Add a "Following" list to the user profile screen.
Current state: UserProfile.tsx exists. The follow API is at /api/users/:id/following.
Follower/following counts are already fetched via the useSocialStats hook.
Open questions: Infinite scroll is not implemented yet. Need to handle the
"is this user followed by me?" state.

Antigravity will respond with a suggested implementation outline. The goal isn't a perfect plan — it's to surface misunderstandings before any code is written.

Planning Checklist

Running through these questions with Antigravity before coding cuts rework dramatically.

On data flow: where does the new component get its data from? On side effects: does this change affect any existing features? On error cases: what does the UI show when the API fails or the list is empty? On testing: what's the unit of work you'll test?


Phase 2: Implement — Building Through Dialogue

Iterative Development with Inline Commands

The most effective technique during implementation is the "try small, fix fast" cycle using Cmd+K (Mac) / Ctrl+K (Windows) inline commands.

// Step 1: Write the skeleton, let Antigravity fill in the body
// Cmd+K → "Implement this function using useInfiniteQuery"
 
export function useFollowingList(userId: string) {
  // ← place cursor here and press Cmd+K
}

When Antigravity generates code, get in the habit of asking why:

// Agent panel: "Why did you choose cursor-based pagination over offset-based?"
 
// Generated code with explanation
export function useFollowingList(userId: string) {
  return useInfiniteQuery({
    queryKey: ["following", userId],
    queryFn: async ({ pageParam }) => {
      // Cursor-based pagination: if users are added or removed frequently,
      // offset-based pagination causes duplicate entries or skipped items
      // at page boundaries. Cursor-based avoids this entirely.
      const res = await fetch(
        `/api/users/${userId}/following?cursor=${pageParam ?? ""}&limit=20`
      );
      if (!res.ok) throw new Error("Failed to fetch following list");
      return res.json() as Promise<{
        users: FollowingUser[];
        nextCursor: string | null;
      }>;
    },
    getNextPageParam: (lastPage) => lastPage.nextCursor,
    initialPageParam: "",
  });
}
 
// Expected behavior:
// - First load: fetches first 20 with no cursor
// - Load more: passes nextCursor from previous page
// - When nextCursor is null, pagination is complete

Unblocking Yourself

When you get stuck, most developers instinctively reach for Google. But asking Antigravity first is often faster.

// Stuck pattern 1: Confusing error message
"I'm getting 'TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')'
when consuming useFollowingList. What are the most likely causes and fixes?"

// Stuck pattern 2: Architecture decision
"Should 'is this user followed by me?' be global Zustand state, or is
component-local state fine? This is a small social app, ~5,000 MAU."

// Stuck pattern 3: Performance concern
"The FollowingList could grow past 1,000 items. How do I improve
rendering performance? Currently rendering everything without virtualization."

Phase 3: Verify — Getting Your Code Reviewed

Request a Review Before Human Review

After finishing an implementation, run an Antigravity review before sending it to teammates. This isn't just about catching embarrassing mistakes — it's about finding design issues you didn't know were there.

// Example review request in the Agent panel
"Review the FollowingList component I just wrote. Focus on:
1. Memory leaks and infinite re-render risks
2. Missing error handling
3. Accessibility (screen reader support)
4. TypeScript type safety"
// Example issue flagged by Antigravity and the fix
 
// ❌ Problem: IntersectionObserver not cleaned up
useEffect(() => {
  const observer = new IntersectionObserver(handleIntersect);
  if (loadMoreRef.current) observer.observe(loadMoreRef.current);
  // No cleanup → memory leak
}, []);
 
// ✅ Fix: Add cleanup function
useEffect(() => {
  const observer = new IntersectionObserver(handleIntersect);
  const element = loadMoreRef.current;
  if (element) observer.observe(element);
 
  return () => {
    if (element) observer.unobserve(element);
    observer.disconnect();
  };
}, [handleIntersect]); // handleIntersect added to deps

Mapping Out Test Cases

Antigravity is particularly good at generating exhaustive test case lists.

// "List test cases for the useFollowingList hook" generates:
 
describe("useFollowingList", () => {
  const futureDate = new Date(Date.now() + 86400000);
  const pastDate = new Date(Date.now() - 86400000);
 
  // Happy path
  it("returns first 20 items on initial load");
  it("appends next page when loadMore is called");
  it("sets hasNextPage to false when nextCursor is null");
 
  // Error cases
  it("enters error state when API returns 401");
  it("enters error state when API returns 500");
  it("enters error state on network failure");
 
  // Edge cases
  it("returns empty array when following count is 0");
  it("does not duplicate requests when mounted multiple times with same userId");
  it("does not update state after component unmounts");
});

Building the Habit

Morning Session Ritual

When you open Antigravity each morning, send a short message to rebuild context from the previous day.

"Continuing UserProfile work today. Yesterday I finished the useFollowingList hook.
Today I'm building the FollowingList UI component and adding follow/unfollow buttons."

This gets Antigravity up to speed instantly and sharpens suggestion quality from the first prompt.

End-of-Session Handoff Note

Before wrapping up, spend five minutes having Antigravity write a context note for tomorrow.

"Summarize what I did today and any unfinished tasks or deferred decisions,
in a format I can paste into AGENTS.md."

Common Failure Patterns

Pattern 1: Asking for Too Much at Once

Large, vague requests degrade output quality significantly.

// ❌ Too broad
"Refactor the entire profile page, improve performance,
write tests, and add Storybook stories."

// ✅ Focused scope
"Optimize rendering in UserProfile.tsx only.
Find places where useMemo and useCallback are missing and add them."

Pattern 2: Accepting Generated Code Without Reading It

Treat Antigravity's output as a first draft, not a final answer. For anything touching security, auth, or payments, always review the code yourself before committing.


Summary

Getting the most out of Antigravity as an AI partner requires deliberately building collaboration into each phase: planning before you code, iterating through dialogue while you build, and requesting a review when you're done.

The single highest-leverage change you can make today: start each session with a two-to-three sentence description of what you're building. That small habit compounds into noticeably better suggestions within a week.

For more, see Antigravity Best Practices and the Custom Agent Creation Guide.

Share

Thank You for Reading

Antigravity Lab is ad-free, supported entirely by members like you. We publish practical guides daily with implementation code, benchmarks, and production-ready patterns. If you've found it useful, we'd love to have you on board.

  • Copy-paste ready implementation code
  • New advanced guides published daily
  • $5/mo or $10 for lifetime access
View Membership →

If you found this article helpful, a small tip ($1.50) would mean a lot to us. Your support helps keep this site ad-free and covers server and hosting costs.

Related Articles

Tips2026-04-04
Antigravity AI Development Workflow Acceleration: A Complete Master Guide — Context Management, Task Decomposition, and Parallel Processing
A comprehensive guide to fundamentally boosting your development speed with Antigravity. Master context management, task decomposition, Planning/Fast mode selection, and parallel processing strategies that professionals use every day.
Tips2026-06-28
Hearing the Audio an Agent Made, Right Inside the Conversation
A recent Antigravity point release added inline audio rendering in the conversation view. Here is how playing agent-made audio in place changes the way I audition sound assets for my apps.
Tips2026-06-14
Keep Side Questions Out of Your Main Thread with Antigravity's /btw
How Antigravity 2.1.4's /btw slash command routes side questions to a disposable subagent so your main agent's context stays clean through long tasks.
📚RECOMMENDED BOOKS
Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch)
Sebastian Raschka
LLM Dev
Prompt Engineering for LLMs
Berryman & Ziegler
Prompting
AI Engineering
Chip Huyen
AI Eng
* Contains affiliate links
See all →