ANTIGRAVITY LABJP
TAG

reliability design

4 articles
Back to all tags
Related:
Antigravity4AI agents4production operations4WIP control1compensating transactions1backpressure1blast radius1
Agents/2026-06-30Advanced

When the Android CLI Got 3x Faster and Cut Tokens by ~70%, the Right Move Was More Verification Per Change — Not More Parallelism

Reading that the Android CLI agent runs ~3x faster while using ~70% fewer tokens, my first instinct was to ask how many runs to parallelize. But a faster agent doesn't change how much work ships — it changes where the queue forms. This walks through why, sizes the new bottleneck (review and verification gates) with Little's Law, enforces a WIP cap with a working Python admission controller, and reinvests the freed budget into depth per change — with measured results.

Agents/2026-06-01Advanced

Rolling Back a Half-Finished Agent: Compensating Transactions for Partial Failure

When you let an Antigravity agent run work that spans several external systems, a failure in the middle leaves the world half-rewritten. Retrying doesn't fix that. Here is how to fold it back safely with compensating transactions (the Saga pattern), with TypeScript and real operational numbers.

Agents/2026-05-31Advanced

Flow Control for Autonomous Agents: Backpressure and Queues That Keep Production Alive

Run several Antigravity agents at once and the problem stops being how smart they are and becomes how little your downstream can absorb. Here is a flow-control design — bounded queue, semaphore, token bucket, backpressure, dead-letter — with TypeScript and real numbers.

Agents/2026-05-30Advanced

Build for the Day the Agent Breaks Something: Keeping Blast Radius Small

Once you let an Antigravity agent touch production, the problem stops being how smart it is and becomes how much it wrecks when it slips. Here is a four-layer containment design that shrinks blast radius, with TypeScript and real numbers.