ANTIGRAVITY LABJP
Articles/Agents & Manager
Agents & Manager/2026-03-26Intermediate

Antigravity Multi-Agent Workflow Guide — Accelerate Development with Multiple AIs

Learn how to use Antigravity's multi-agent features to dramatically speed up your development workflow. From Manager Surface basics to advanced agent coordination patterns.

antigravity429multi-agent49manager-surface3ai-agent18workflow49

Setup and context — Why Multi-Agent Changes Everything

Using AI assistants in software development is becoming commonplace, but relying on a single AI for everything has clear limitations. Code generation, test writing, documentation updates, and code reviews all demand different kinds of expertise.

Antigravity's multi-agent feature was designed to solve this problem. Multiple AI agents each handle their area of specialization, coordinating through the Manager Surface to achieve development efficiency that a single agent simply cannot match.

Manager Surface Basics

The Manager Surface is the central interface for Antigravity's multi-agent capabilities. It's where you launch agents, assign tasks, and monitor progress.

Launching and Configuring Agents

Open the Manager Surface from Antigravity's command palette by searching for Manager Surface, or use the keyboard shortcut Cmd+Shift+M (macOS) / Ctrl+Shift+M (Windows/Linux).

# You can also launch agents from the Antigravity CLI
# Run from your project root
antigravity agent start --name "code-reviewer" --role "Code Review Specialist"
antigravity agent start --name "test-writer" --role "Test Suite Generator"
antigravity agent start --name "doc-updater" --role "Documentation Maintainer"
 
# Check running agents
antigravity agent list
 
# Expected output:
# ID    NAME            ROLE                       STATUS
# ag-1  code-reviewer   Code Review Specialist     active
# ag-2  test-writer     Test Suite Generator        active
# ag-3  doc-updater     Documentation Maintainer    active

Each agent can be assigned a role, which functions as a system prompt that specializes its behavior for the designated task.

Assigning Tasks

Assign tasks to agents through the Manager Surface task panel or directly via CLI.

# Assign tasks to specific agents
antigravity agent assign ag-1 --task "Review src/auth/login.ts and report security concerns"
antigravity agent assign ag-2 --task "Create unit tests for src/auth/login.ts"
antigravity agent assign ag-3 --task "Update src/auth/README.md to match the latest login.ts implementation"
 
# Check task progress
antigravity agent status
 
# Expected output:
# ag-1 [code-reviewer]  ████████░░ 80%  Reviewing login.ts...
# ag-2 [test-writer]    ██████░░░░ 60%  Writing unit tests...
# ag-3 [doc-updater]    ████░░░░░░ 40%  Updating README.md...

Practical Coordination Patterns

The real power of multi-agent workflows emerges when agents coordinate to handle complex development scenarios.

Pattern 1: Pipeline (Sequential Processing)

A chain where one agent's output becomes the next agent's input.

# .antigravity/workflows/pipeline.yaml
name: code-quality-pipeline
description: Validate code quality through sequential stages
 
steps:
  - agent: code-generator
    task: "Generate code based on user requirements"
    output: generated_code
 
  - agent: code-reviewer
    task: "Review generated code for security and quality"
    input: $generated_code
    output: review_report
 
  - agent: test-writer
    task: "Create test suite incorporating review findings"
    input: $generated_code, $review_report
    output: test_suite
 
  - agent: doc-updater
    task: "Update documentation based on final code and tests"
    input: $generated_code, $test_suite

The pipeline pattern ensures quality at each stage. The flow of code generation → review → testing → documentation mirrors the same process a human team would follow.

Pattern 2: Fan-Out (Parallel Processing)

Multiple agents execute independent tasks simultaneously, then aggregate results.

# .antigravity/workflows/fan-out.yaml
name: comprehensive-analysis
description: Run multi-dimensional codebase analysis in parallel
 
parallel:
  - agent: security-scanner
    task: "Scan dependencies for vulnerabilities"
    output: security_report
 
  - agent: performance-analyzer
    task: "Identify bottlenecks and create a performance report"
    output: performance_report
 
  - agent: accessibility-checker
    task: "Audit for WCAG 2.1 compliance"
    output: a11y_report
 
aggregate:
  agent: report-compiler
  task: "Consolidate three reports into a prioritized action list"
  input: $security_report, $performance_report, $a11y_report

Fan-out dramatically reduces total time by running independent tasks in parallel. If you're already comfortable with single-agent operations, the transition to this pattern is straightforward.

Pattern 3: Monitor and Feedback Loop

One agent monitors another's output and creates a feedback loop when quality standards aren't met.

// Define a custom workflow in TypeScript
import { AgentManager, WorkflowBuilder } from "@antigravity/agents";
 
const manager = new AgentManager();
 
const workflow = new WorkflowBuilder()
  .addAgent("implementer", {
    role: "Feature Implementation Specialist",
    maxRetries: 3,
  })
  .addAgent("quality-gate", {
    role: "Quality Assurance Gate",
    criteria: {
      testCoverage: 80,
      lintErrors: 0,
      typeErrors: 0,
      docCoverage: 100,
    },
  })
  .setFeedbackLoop("quality-gate", "implementer", {
    onFail: (report) => ({
      message: `The following criteria were not met:\n${report.failures.join("\n")}`,
      action: "retry_with_feedback",
    }),
  })
  .build();
 
const result = await manager.run(workflow, {
  task: "Implement password reset for user authentication",
});
 
console.log(result.summary);
// Expected output:
// ✅ Implementation complete after 2 feedback iterations
// - Test coverage: 85%
// - Lint errors: 0
// - Type errors: 0
// - Doc coverage: 100%

Common Errors and Solutions

Multi-agent environments introduce error types you won't encounter with a single agent.

Context Sharing Conflicts

When agents try to modify the same files, Antigravity uses a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts. However, deadlocks can occur if multiple agents attempt simultaneous edits on the same file.

The solution is to clearly define file ownership during workflow design. Pipeline patterns naturally provide exclusive access, but fan-out patterns require ensuring each agent operates on non-overlapping files.

Optimizing Resource Consumption

Running multiple agents simultaneously increases API calls and token usage. To control costs, assign lightweight models to simple tasks (linting, format checking) and reserve high-performance models for critical tasks (security reviews, architecture decisions).

Summary

Antigravity's multi-agent feature is a powerful tool for fundamentally streamlining your development workflow. By understanding the three core patterns — Pipeline, Fan-Out, and Monitor/Feedback — you can handle virtually any development scenario.

Start with just two agents (code generation + review), then expand your workflow gradually. The key isn't adding more agents — it's deepening each agent's specialization and improving the quality of their coordination.

Share

Thank You for Reading

Antigravity Lab is ad-free, supported entirely by members like you. We publish practical guides daily with implementation code, benchmarks, and production-ready patterns. If you've found it useful, we'd love to have you on board.

  • Copy-paste ready implementation code
  • New advanced guides published daily
  • $5/mo or $10 for lifetime access
View Membership →

If you found this article helpful, a small tip ($1.50) would mean a lot to us. Your support helps keep this site ad-free and covers server and hosting costs.

Related Articles

Agents & Manager2026-03-30
Antigravity × Durable Execution: Designing Fault-Tolerant Long-Running AI Tasks
An implementation guide for putting Antigravity agents to work on long-running jobs using Durable Execution — covering checkpointing, idempotency, and automatic retries, plus three real incidents from a 50M-download indie app and seven production pitfalls the official docs never spell out.
Agents & Manager2026-06-21
Letting a Background Agent Work Overnight Without Regretting It by Morning — Guardrails for Unattended Runs
When you hand overnight refactoring to Antigravity's Background Agent, the morning brings as much anxiety as convenience. From three angles — blast radius, completion criteria, and detecting silent regressions — here are the guardrails that let me run unattended jobs with confidence.
Agents & Manager2026-06-19
Your Antigravity Sandbox Isolates Multi-Agents Less Than You Think — Notes on Containing the Blast Radius
An Antigravity sandbox gives you the feeling of isolation, but isolation leaks through three real gaps: shared volumes, over-broad allowed domains, and approval fatigue. Field notes on plugging the leaks, containing the blast radius by design, and proving isolation holds with tests.
📚RECOMMENDED BOOKS
Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch)
Sebastian Raschka
LLM Dev
Prompt Engineering for LLMs
Berryman & Ziegler
Prompting
AI Engineering
Chip Huyen
AI Eng
* Contains affiliate links
See all →